close button

Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford

It seems that every month a new brand pops up and smacks us all in the face with some cool shoes. Well this month it is Massimo Ferrari and I must say that I am quite impressed overall with what they are capable of doing. As I wrote a few weeks ago, Massimo Ferrari is yet another brand sprouting-up out of East Asia and is set to show once more that Europe is not the only place that can make well-made benchgrade RTW shoes. Hailing out of Vietnam with a background as a luxury men™s lifestyle brand, encompassing everything from RTW clothes and shoes to bespoke tailoring, it is quite surprising that for a brand that is not necessarily focused on one particular thing that they manage to be at least getting one of those things right. This is not the case for all brands that make everything but specialize in nothing.

Massimo Ferrari Massimo Ferrari Massimo Ferrari Massimo Ferrari Massimo Ferrari

Curious to know more about them (i.e. fit and quality), they were kind enough to send me a shoe to review, and not only just some RTW shoe, but pretty much whatever I wanted (that being, an MTO). Being the semi-dandy that I can be and having covered all of my bases in the shades of black/brown/burgundy, I decided to get something that spoke volumes on my self-proclaimed exuberant character. And what better to represent that than a lovely 2-tone adelaide? Nothing really. So that™s what I went with, combining colors and materials that I have yet to do at any other point in time. And needless to say, I was quite impressed with how they came out and even more in disbelief with how much I liked the color combination of black and brown sitting together in the same shoe.

Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford

Straight out of the box, the shoes looked and felt like a well-made pair of shoes, being supportive, comfortable and elegant without question. The leather and suede was top notch, I imagine being French (the leather) and English (the suede). The stitching of the upper and finishing of the sole was clean and tidy and the presentation of the packaging was that of a 800 shoe, all but missing a shoehorn or something. But for me that is neither here nor there. What was important was the fact that there really was not one detail that was out of place. And all of that for a shoe that ranges between 240-260 ($395-$425) and a MTO between 288-312 (20% mark-up). That is quite impressive and that is what these East Asian factories are bringing to the table. And when comparing the shoes quality to that of an English maker, I would honestly put them up there with all the rest of the makers that sell between 300-350 (at least from what I saw in my pair).

Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford

What I didn™t like in the shoes were 3 things really and were all a matter of preference. First, I was not crazy about the detailing in which they made the sides of the sole, whereby it came to a point instead of being traditionally flush (straight edge). It seemed a bit too Rock N™ Roll for my liking. But hey, that is just an opinion. Secondly, I felt that in the balance something was not completely right. There seemed to be a bit too much toe spring which to me created a sort of seesaw effect under the ball of the foot. I think that this occurred because the sole of the forefoot area was not completely flush and instead had more of a convex shape were the peak of the convex was dead in the center of the forefoot. Spending too much time around bespoke shoes makes you snobby in details like this.

The last thing was the fact that I felt that the mouth of the shoe (where you put your feet in) was too big. This is great for attempting to fit all feet thus allowing people with wide feet to get inside a non-wide shoe. But it is not good for narrow feet whereby the heel then has more chances of popping out.

Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford

Overall, for the price that they sell it is a great value for money shoe and I would buy them all day long. The only downside is that their online website is still under construction and one can only buy the shoes by email or going to Vietnam. But this does not seem too abnormal these days as many of us are attempting to grow our brands and doing a website properly, takes time. That being, if require further information or wish to make a purchase, the person to contact would be Mr. Antonio Torres and his email is:

Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford Massimo Ferrari Spectator oxford

9 thoughts on “Massimo Ferrari Review”

  1. I’m not sure about where they go at that price, where they’re directly up against, say, Carmina, Vass, or the traditional beloveds like Alfred Sargeant or entry-level Crockett & Jones. Heck, they’re head to head with Mr J K Fitzpatrick even! For an unknown quantity with no web presence, I suspect they’re going to have to get a lot more marketing out there, and maybe consolidate in a couple of other international outlets at some point.

    But what I definitely like is your choice of shoe. That colour combination is something I’ve been looking for!

    1. yea, they will have a bit of a journey to start competing in the Western Hemi…..but they seem financially sound so it might not be a problem to get a big marketing project together! I know, this color was surprisingly good, just might done one myself!

  2. I don’t like this brand. I’m Italian, and their marketing strategy is uncorrect. The name, “Massimo Ferrari”, is Italian, as it is the motto “calzature artigianali” (artisanal shoes). That flower (unfortunately I don’t know its English name) is the symbol of Florence. In my very humble opinion, this is not correct at all. I would not expect something like “Chang Show, Proudly made in Vietnam”, since I know something made in east Asia has not the appeal an Italian made shoe has, but this seems a way to swindle less prepared customers.

    1. Not super relevant to a shoe blog, but for further reference, the “English” name for that flower is just the appropriated French “Fleur-de-lis.”

      Or, apparently, when it’s got the stamens like that, the “Florentine Lily.” But still just a variation on the fleur-de-lis.

    2. The owner of this brand is an Italian guy named Luis Antonio Torres, not a local Easy Asian. The brand name is not a marketing trickery, even though the shoe factory and Luis himself reside in Saigon, Vietnam.

    3. whether or not it is really trickery, it’s never going to change. There are certain barriers to entry that unfortunately exist in the shoe industry and your name/idea can hurt you. Unfortunately there is a stigma with east asian produced products that on one hand is completely justified but then makes it hard for good brands from there to actually make a name for themselves….

  3. agree with matteo. if Asian shoemakers are making a good product & want to improve brand reputation why create a false impression of who they are and their origins.
    saying this though its interesting to note that many French luxury brands imitated English names as 100-150 years ago anglophiles looked towards England as the height of style .. JM Weston springs to mind but there are several French clothing businesses ironically now making clothes of a higher quality than their English counterparts (many of whom are out of business anyway) with a similar history of taking English names. who knows in 200 years maybe Vietnam or a Guangdong will be making the best shoes in the world (although they may incorporate hover technology by then 🙂 )

  4. Peter Schwerzmann

    It seems to me that these shoes when you look at them closer are far from what you expect from a top-quality product. It may be that the price is right, but in this price category you also have to develop the appropriate models that create a “wow” effect and the customer wants to buy such shoes.

    Nowadays, almost all shoes come from Asia, but the big problem is still the equipment suppliers with the know-how of Europe are missing. These shoes (Massimo Ferrari) look like “dead dogs in my eyes”, which is a shoemaker’s master expression when something is wrong. Lately, you see many shoes “made in Vietnam” on the market. No matter what you touch it is lady fashion, men’s or sports shoes always something is not right about the shoes.

    There is no time to develop and test the shoes properly and no attention to detail. Top classic shoes are modeled after the golden cut, which is enormously important for the last fit and for the eye. Only old trained professionals with the necessary experience understand what it means to make the best shoes. Unfortunately, as with many crafts, the old people die with the knowledge and the young are not able to follow in their footsteps. The best fruits are always at the top of the tree and you can’t get them because they are too difficult to pick.

    1. Justin FitzPatrick

      I cannot say that I agree but I appreciate you sharing. Since this post was created, they have actually come a long way. Massimo Ferrari was one of the first to go out to SE Asia and produce. The quality has since changed. Some of the shoes today are coming out of China and I have no self-interest in saying this. It is simply objective.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *